CONFIRMED: Notre Dame was virtually unhurt by the fire, and any claims that it has to be "rebuilt" are hoaxes with a motive

The hoax of Notre Dame:

This hoax involved burning a wooden facade "roof" that probably kept water off a secondary roof and prevented freezing problems with the second roof, and NOTHING MORE. Unlike what you have been told by the scamming MSM, the cathedral would never have collapsed because the actual support for the cathedral was provided by the side arches, and the arches of an interior brick and concrete roof three feet thick. This secondary interior roof prevented damage to the inside of the cathedral, except where the spire (questionably, it likely had help) "fell through" it.

The hoax about the cathedral being "destroyed" is now confirmed. Let's get this party started.

Here is how the wooden roof was attached. You can clearly see the concrete dome roof under it was supporting it, and now has less weight to hold with it gone and it would actually be less likely to collapse now provided the heat of the fire did not significantly damage it:

Here is a picture of that burned wooden roof laying on top of the concrete and brick roof under it. Notre Dame was built a LOT better than anything the Romans ever did. With the Roman stuff, once the wooden roof was gone, all that remained was pillars. Clearly here, the real roof consisted of a series of concrete and brick domes.

Here's why the cathedral was, except for where the spire fell through, unscathed:

When you consider the scale of the above picture, the concrete and brick were at least three feet thick on the interior roof. There's no way this cathedral got significantly hurt, to the tune of a billion dollars.

Let's take a look at the inside after the fire

Clearly, from the aftermath photo of the interior, they could turn the lights back on if they wanted to. The concrete roof held up so well for so long that there's not even significant smoke damage.

Conclusion: The cathedral is not destroyed, and any stories about how it got devastated are only cover for bilking cash for pork barrel projects and excuses to delay, delay, AND DELAY re-opening it. The cash is there to fix this PRONTO. If the desire is there to fix it (by the people in control), it ought to be open before the end of August with money obviously being no object.

There's no excuse to delay re-opening this cathedral. It was clearly designed to get through a worst case scenario, for the purpose of protecting the priceless antiquities it contained, and the plan worked. Not a single antiquity was lost. None of the candles in the cathedral melted. It got through this that well. If this cathedral does not open STAT, it is because someone (who is importing hordes of Muslims to overtake and destroy Europe) does not want it to open.

MMMAAAYYYYYYYYBE:

A recent Trump tweet:

@realDonaldTrump
5h5 hours ago

Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called "notes, " when the notes never existed until needed. Because I never agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the "Report" about me, some of which are total bullshit & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened, a big, fat, waste of time, energy and money - $30, 000, 000 to be exact. It is now finally time to turn the tables and bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people who have committed very serious crimes, perhaps even Spying or Treason. This should never happen again!

REPEAT: "It is now finally time to turn the tables and bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people who have committed very serious crimes, perhaps even Spying or Treason. This should never happen again!

My comment: MMMAAAYYYYYYYYYYBE. Maybe not in this totally subverted and corrupted hoax system. Time will tell I guess.

Mueller probe so redacted that when I saw all the pages put in a graphic on Drudge I at first thought it was a DNA graphic:

Ernie and Bert's "playtime in the bed" episodes gone from Mex TV

A while ago I mentioned how Sesame Street had gone gay with Ernie and Bert being a gay couple. Each episode of "Ernie and Bert" would start with one of the beds dancing, and one of the two jumping into the dancing bed with the other. Then they'd have a "sesame street" type of adventure. As it turns out, the writer really was gay. Sesame street then made an announcement that Ernie and Bert were not a gay couple, and I have not seen it on TV anymore, at least not here. So they might have removed it.

However, one glaringly obvious thing about Sesame street now is that it does not educate the way it used to, it is just a puppet show. Sure, occasionally they'll do A B and C but back in the day they'd say "this day's episode is dedicated to the letter _ and the entire episode would focus on teaching that letter, or that number, and there's no way a kid would not at least learn the alphabet or how to count. With today's sesame street, that would be impossible. No kid will learn anything at all. But at least "learning nothing at all" is better than learning to jump into bed with the same sex to have an adventure. Sesame street is not even a shadow of what it once was but at least it backed off on some of the crap.

Ditto for Spongebob, I have not seen anything bad in any of the newer episodes over the last couple years.

For the first time in two weeks, Venezuela hit 90+ percent power restoration

I have been paying attention to this, during the rolling blackouts they are keeping a portion of Venezuela's grid offline, most likely to make it virus and attack resistant. Maduro announced he was going to do this while rationing power. It is slowly stabilizing and coming back stronger and stronger, with no major drop outs like before. Only time will tell if it is actually made attack resistant and stabilizes for real.

Trump survived the Mueller investigation because he did everything right.

He never agreed to be directly interviewed and cross examined, he never did anything to interfere, he never fired anyone or pardoned anyone, he just sat there and took it. There appears to be lots of interesting stuff in the Mueller release, which was obviously timed for Easter so it would get the least possible attention. Trump now needs to go for blood and DRAIN THE SWAMP, surely he can now.

BURNING OF NOTRE DAME MOSTLY A FAILURE THAT DID NOT ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVE

I have gone over the photos and will put it briefly: The roof that burned was not the roof that everyone saw when they went into the cathedral. Under the roof that burned was a second roof that was not flammable. The only part of the second roof that failed was where the spire fell through. When the spire fell, the firefighters were already gunning water into the place, so virtually no smoke damage or other damage happened. The remainder of the second roof under the one that burned for the most part did not fail, and remains in place. This is why the cathedral appears to be so unscathed on the interior, because it never experienced the fire.

LUCIFERIAN CHILD RAPING FRAZZLEDRIP SLAVE TRADING ORGAN HARVESTING HATE AMERICA NEW WORLD ORDER CELEBRATION CRUISE FAIL.

As it turns out, the fire department chaplain went in and saved the crown of thorns and one other priceless artifact, but if he had not, they would not have been hurt anyway, the cathedral held up THAT WELL. Adding insult to injury for the satanists, the spire that collapsed had a large number of beautiful statues on it that were removed with a crane on April 12, before they set the fire. So when it collapsed, even those were not lost, it was just an empty wooden structure that was going to be renovated anyway.

Not rumor: Michelle Obama was on a yacht with a bunch of other "elites" in the Seine river in sight of Notre Dame burning

Supposedly it is just "coincidence" and (she) is all sad. Oh well I guess, things are starting to stitch together here.

NOT "MUSLIMS".

I did not want to link this because the Daily Fail goes to great lengths to state how "sad" (she) was and that kind of lie turns my gut but figure the odds. What are the odds that this Cretin&Co of elites just happened to be cruising on the river as the cathedral burned? FIGURE THE ODDS.

SLAM DUNK: WHAT DID I SAY OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN? THE OLD RUSSIA NEVER DIED, IT JUST PLAYED DEAD

HERE IS PROOF: Headline: Stalin's Approval Rating Among Russians Hits Record High of 70%

From the Moscow Times:

"A record 70 percent of Russians approve of Soviet leader Josef Stalin's role in Russian history, according to a poll published by the independent Levada Center pollster on Tuesday.

Stalin's image has been gradually rehabilitated in the 2000s from that of a bloody autocrat to an "outstanding leader." President Vladimir Putin has revived the Soviet anthem, Soviet-style military parades and a Soviet-era medal for labor during his presidency.

Seventy percent of Russian respondents told the Levada Center in 2019 that Stalin played a positive role for Russia. Stalin's previous record approval rating stood at 54 percent in 2016.

A record low of 19 percent viewed Stalin's role negatively, down from 32 percent in 2016.

"Stalin begins to be perceived as a symbol of justice and an alternative to the current government, deemed unfair, cruel and not caring about people, " Academy of Sciences sociologist Leonty Byzov was quoted as saying by the RBC news website."

MY COMMENT: TOLD YOU SO, FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS. Now read it in the Moscow Times. 70 percent approval is mind blowing, and if it is the result of "gradual rehabilitation" for the last 3 decades as the article states, the old Russia never died and spent the last 30 years regaining control of the minds of the Russian people.

I was the ONLY ONE SAYING IT. I know of no other. And I stood my ground and WAS RIGHT.

Putin is KGB. What else would you expect KGB to do, other than try to bring the old order back? And he's probably not even the original Putin, as I have also said before. If 70 percent of the public views Stalin favorably, Russia is going to go right down the ol' shitteree. Yep, RT can be accurate on American issues and still slam Russia into the gutter. They can gain favors with the American people by saying the obvious, while they obfuscate and slam their own wrongdoings into obscurity, JUST LIKE AMERICAN MEDIA DOES TO AMERICA.

HEADS UP: RED DAWN IS BACK ON THE RADAR.

HERE WE GO! "Experts" claim it will "take decades" to repair Notre Dame Cathedral

FACT: If you gave that job to Donald Trump, it would be finished in a year flat and stand for another 800 years NO SWEAT.

Modern tech could have that thing better than new in NO TIME if someone wanted to do it quickly and price was no problem. You can bet that price is NO PROBLEM. Anyone claiming it has to take decades to fix it is setting the precedent for it never opening again, just like I said below in the post about Macron vowing to rebuild it when I called B.S. on that. He wants it torn down, no if's or buts. Every last thing about that cathedral is known, down to the final letter. They know how to replace that roof already. Every last thing in that cathedral is no doubt already in CAD. Any major construction firm could take that data and punch up a perfect repair schedule in a week flat. Decades to fix it? THAT'S BULLSHIT.

I did not know the actual crown of thorns Jesus wore was in Notre Dame Cathedral

Guess what? The fire department Chaplain ran into the cathedral while it was burning, and saved the crown of thorns. Some people were worried it was destroyed. As it turns out, it was not destroyed.

If he had done that in the United States, he'd have been cited for a "work place safety violation" and FIRED. Kudos to the brave man!

RUMOR REALLY IS "CIRCULATING THE KREMLIN" THAT PUTIN HAS FORMALLY AND OFFICIALLY OFFERED TO HELP RESTORE NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL

HA HA HA, Let's see ANYONE attempt to get away with tearing it down now.

Notre Dame Cathedral artistically shown as collapsing in I Pet Goat 2, and This movie has a reference to the cathedral not being there anymore.

OUT TAKE: Muslims did not burn that Cathedral if the exact scenario it suffered was in I Pet Goat2, (including the spire collapse) and just like 911, movies referenced it's destruction beforehand.

Go over the photos. Assange looks like he's been fruitified.

Assange probably got removed from the embassy for two and a half years, got erased by drugs and shock treatment, and returned for the "arrest" scene while Ecuador played it's part for 4+ billion. Look at how different Assange's root existence changed. The body is the same, the mind is not. And it is obvious enough to need him out of the news ASAP. I have drastically changed the for/against "legitimacy" post below, it has now become obvious the entire Assange cover story is a full on sham. Scroll down to that, because the following has to be on top:

What do you do when you need to change the news cycle? Burn a historic church!

Dime to a dollar says that's what we are looking at with Notre Dame Cathedral, the French government did it (probably with a little help from you know who) NO IFS OR BUTS.

UPDATE: Macron has supposedly "vowed to rebuild" Notre Dame Cathedral

I CALL BULLSHIT. Let's see THAT happen. The only way it will happen is if the only possible reasons for burning it to begin with were:

1. To distract the news cycle.

2. To cause a religion war and Macron got busted.

Perhaps Macron is backing off because the very FIRST thing to hit the alt media news cycle in a big way was that the Mossad burned the cathedral. If that's where alt media took it right from the get-go, obviously the best thing to do is apologize and REBUILD IT. MACRON HAS BEEN PEGGED AS THE GUY THAT HAD IT BURNED QUITE NICELY, SEE THE FOLLOWING:

Another Notre Dame Cathedral fire update: Perpetrators pegged with 90+ percent probability

TO THOSE OF YOU IN ALT MEDIA SAYING THE MOSSAD DID THIS, HERE'S A NICE LITTLE TIDBIT THAT BASICALLY CINCHES IT: WHILE THE CATHEDRAL WAS STILL BURNING, MACRON STATED THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE WAS NOT ARSON.

Do you know how long arson investigations sometimes last? Sometimes, a year or more. You can't say the cause of a fire was not arson when it is still too hot to go in and look at a single thing. This means, with Macron claiming what he did, that the fire was virtually assured to have been a targeted hit, done with Macron's approval and that it WAS ARSON.

Would the Mossad do it for Macron? YEP.

Go over the reports. A large number of them have arson ruled out as a cause. That's IMPOSSIBLE, the perpetrators of this event are part of the government if arson is already "ruled out". Is there a demolition scheduled?, JUST WATCH: There's little damage to the actual interior, the fire looks bad but it was contained to only the roof and the steeple that collapsed, and whatever the steeple fell on below. Firefighters were gunning water into the bottom so fiercely that even the candles survived. The church is miraculously mostly intact. Let's wait and see if the cathedral is ordered to be demolished, despite being practically undamaged, except for an easily replaced roof.

UPDATE: Notre Dame Cathedral mostly unscathed by the massive fire (even the candles made it) UNBELIEVABLE, SEE THIS

Did a divine hand save this church, or was it simply the way it was made? The lack of damage to the actual interior is astonishing. There is not even extensive smoke damage.

Notre Dame Cathedral rumors:

Thus far it is only rumor, but rumor has it that the Mossad burned it down. I am not kidding, that really is the rumor. Purportedly to frame Muslims. I am not going to get onto this topic much, but will say it makes perfect sense. First of all, Muslims held the keys to many of the churches in Jerusalem for hundreds of years on end when there were not enough Christians to use them, and guarded the churches perfectly, despite them being Christian.

I find it highly plausible that the Mossad burned the cathedral down either to frame Muslims or, if the cathedral is ordered demolished or never gets permits to re-open, to strike out Christian roots. It is, as far as I see it, a good thing the story drifted to "the mossad did it" so quickly. BECAUSE: Silverstein said pull it, and building 7 fell simply because it was grief stricken over the deaths of towers 1 and 2. Five guys danced. Had a cool pain job on the van too. It is a good idea to question the Mossad for Notre Dame, because the basements of the WTC exploded before the planes hit, and when the towers fell, there were demolition sprites at regular intervals during the collapse, plus obviously shape charge cut debris, and well, you know. Not Muslims.

If the Mossad burning down the Notre Dame Cathedral hits alt media mainstream, I'll be doing the snoopy dance because after all, WHO WANTS CHRISTIANITY DESTROYED? Just ask your nearest luciferian, or your nearest feminist leader, or your nearest communist. Gee, they are backed predominantly by the same people who backed the Mossad, Muslims don't hate Christians, - in fact, Muslims know Christ is going to return again for the 1000 year reign, that AINT MOHAMMED, who are those claiming Muslims despise Christians trying to fool?

FACT: Muslims did not burn down the Notre Dame Cathedral. Heck, maybe it was burned down because people can obviously see the root existence of Julian Assange has been wiped out. He looks like sentient vegetable Assange, 90 percent brain damaged. I am perfectly game for: Assange was removed the night of October 16/17 2016, vegetablized and homogenized, and then returned for a final showing when the time was right, for a 4+ bil payoff. That would explain everything, including poop on the walls. And the pictures sure look the part, he's a smiling veggie boy now. No Wikileaks dead man switch either. TIME TO REMOVE ASSANGE FROM THE NEWS CYCLE BEFORE PEOPLE REALLY LOOK INTO THIS, WHAT CAN WE DO . . . . . HMMMMM I GOT IT! Let's give France a taste of 911!

CONFIRMED: WIKILEAKS RELEASED NOTHING

ZERO, ZIP, NADA, EVERYTHING EVERYONE IS CLAIMING IS THE DUMP IS STUFF THEY RELEASED LONG AGO, ALL COMPILED ONTO ONE LARGE PAGE. And that's exactly what I'd expect if Wikileaks is, as I suspected, dead, and was dead before this latest Assange "arrest".

Here is what I really think went on: Assange got removed from the embassy on the night between October 16 and 17 2016. The live stream of this proved something went on the night after Pamela brought him that lunch. Ok, so what if it was spiked with pure psychedelic "whatever? " Assange would be wrecked for the long haul but would survive. So messed up and delerious he'd think he was dying. Pamela herself said he was not feeling well after eating it. That's a BIG red flag - probably a secret message to those in the know. He then agrees to be removed from the embassy. The black van takes him away, to a different location for a couple years, and Ecuador plays the game for a payoff while the CIA homogenizes his brain with a fruitcake cocktail for years. Then, when needed, (and recovered enough) they put him back in the embassy. He's so messed up he really did smear poop on the walls, but not for more than a small time back, to stage the arrest, and Ecuador in exchange for going along with it for all this time, gets the 4+ billion payoff.

If it is Assange and not a body double, this has to have been what happened, I was online posting during the live stream and said that night he was gone right when he was taken, plus said the next day he was gone and then his internet was "gone" and that was not a coincidence. The media at the time stated openly Pamela hated him and they were wondering why she'd buy him lunch. Then the "love story" kicked off and I called B.S. the entire time. Now he's a clearly screwed up dude, whacked out of his mind when all the previous years did not make him whacked out of his mind. What happened during the last two and a half? NO BALCONY APPEARANCE, NOT EVEN A CAMEO?

I know I am right about this, but feel it will be impossible to overcome the official lie this time. I think it was Assange in the photos, and they screwed him up GOOD. The Wikileaks saga is over. All we got was regurgitated crap in the "life insurance" release. This time, the deep state won.

Assange does not look right in the police van. SEE THIS. Compare photos.

He aged too much, and his base persona is very different from photos, even "recent" 2016 photos. It is either not the same guy, or something horrible happened to him that tweaked his brain to a different world. Like lots of shock therapy or really bad psych drugs.

Boeing has officially stated that the 737 MAX is not fit to ever take off from an airport that is more than a mile in altitude. That's ridiculous, considering the 707 of the late 1950's was fit to take off from La Paz Bolivia's airport, at 13, 000+ feet. Clearly, there's common core crap going on at Boeing now.

DUE TO NEW INFO, THE FOLLOWING HAS CHANGED:

My current take on Wikileaks and Assange (this has changed HUGELY) there's really nothing in support of the current events being real

1.After going over the photos of Assange more closely, it looks like his base persona changed too much and that drugs or other "treatment" had to have caused it. So #1 is now a negative, and I believe they want photos of him out of the news cycle ASAP.

2. The media smear campaign may be accurate, Assange may have smeared poop on the walls after getting his brain erased, so #2 is now a negative.

3. The payoff of 4.3 billion to Ecuador is actually a negative, they probably received that for keeping their mouths shut about Assange.

4. Supposedly a total wiki dump was done But a close look at what was dumped now confirms there's nothing new, it is all a PILE OF CRAP. #4 is now a huge red flag NEGATIVE.

5. Anonymous cyber attacked the HELL out of Ecuador. That did not change from a positive to a negative, however, Anonymous is like you and me, they are just people who can be fooled. So they'd attack.

Now the original - What hurts the legitimacy of the event:

1. The total "wiki dump" where everything was dumped appears to be a compliation of previous dumps, and contained far too many things I already have and have posted, even without Wikileaks. That's a big problem. I predict ZERO items of relevance will be found that we don't already know., but it looked good for politics, The entire dump is here. Granted, I did not go through it all, but I have seen tons of what is on that list before. This is not what I would expect from the legit Wikileaks. Maybe someone will find something but I have heard NADA and first glance was not one of good impression.

2. As I stated before, none of the original top people on the Wikileaks staff are still around, the three top players got killed off in 2016 and then there was the anomaly with Assange, where his "internet got cut" for an ENORMOUS time span, right in the middle of it all, and he never once afterward showed up on the balcony, which he had TOTAL access to, the embassy gave him that room so there's no explanation for why he did not ever show up there.

3. Deep fakes are absolutely real, and what has happened with the Gettysburg Address proves faking Assange would be a cakewalk. Add to this the fact that someone live streamed Assange being removed the day before his internet got cut, purportedly for medical reasons after he got poisoned, and things look really sketchy.

4. All of the original police van arrest photos were taken by RT staff. How did they get a monopoly on this? For HOURS, RT was the only one with the story, until others started referencing RT. Why? Because if it was done by deep fake, there would only be one source. The source the most people trusted was chosen.

5. When I went to post about the problems with the Assange story, someone was actually audacious enough to highlight everything I typed in blue right in front of me, and delete it. When that happened, It was obvious someone did not want it stated and placed in a prominent location. I don't know how they expected me to just suck it up and not re-write it all, but they at least tried. And that speaks volumes.

I am skeptical it was assange and not a deep fake, but am also skeptical of it being a deep fake rather than Assange. I really do not know what to think. If we don't see actual video of Assange soon, that alone will speak volumes, why would there be none, even from the court?

Granted, the Gettysburg Address "Mandela" fakery compliments of the tech left is not helping things either. It has nothing to do with Wikileaks directly, but does clearly show that extremely convincing and downright audacious fakery can and will be done.

Perhaps the real issue with my doubting all of this originates from a proven scamming press that can't be trusted to tell the truth with anything at all, and instead repeatedly produces fake after fake after fake. Given the background of what went on with Assange, a fair degree of skepticism is certainly in order. I am going to have to sit this one out and watch for screw ups.

My current take on Wikileaks and Assange

Pros (for ithe current events being legit:)

1. Assange looked absolutely real, and exactly how I'd expect him to look if he was holed up out of sight for almost 3 years.

2. The media smear campaign boosted the credibility of this event a lot.

3. The payoff of 4.3 billion to Ecuador.

4. Supposedly a total wiki dump was done.

5. Anonymous cyber attacked the HELL out of Ecuador.

What hurts the legitimacy of the event:

1. The total "wiki dump" where everything was dumped appears to be a compliation of previous dumps, and contained far too many things I already have and have posted, even without Wikileaks. That's a big problem. I predict ZERO items of relevance will be found that we don't already know., but it looked good for politics, The entire dump is here. Granted, I did not go through it all, but I have seen tons of what is on that list before. This is not what I would expect from the legit Wikileaks. Maybe someone will find something but I have heard NADA and first glance was not one of good impression.

2. As I stated before, none of the original top people on the Wikileaks staff are still around, the three top players got killed off in 2016 and then there was the anomaly with Assange, where his "internet got cut" for an ENORMOUS time span, right in the middle of it all, and he never once afterward showed up on the balcony, which he had TOTAL access to, the embassy gave him that room so there's no explanation for why he did not ever show up there.

3. Deep fakes are absolutely real, and what has happened with the Gettysburg Address proves faking Assange would be a cakewalk. Add to this the fact that someone live streamed Assange being removed the day before his internet got cut, purportedly for medical reasons after he got poisoned, and things look really sketchy.

4. All of the original police van arrest photos were taken by RT staff. How did they get a monopoly on this? For HOURS, RT was the only one with the story, until others started referencing RT. Why? Because if it was done by deep fake, there would only be one source. The source the most people trusted was chosen.

5. When I went to post about the problems with the Assange story, someone was actually audacious enough to highlight everything I typed in blue right in front of me, and delete it. When that happened, It was obvious someone did not want it stated and placed in a prominent location. I don't know how they expected me to just suck it up and not re-write it all, but they at least tried. And that speaks volumes.

I am skeptical it was assange and not a deep fake, but am also skeptical of it being a deep fake rather than Assange. I really do not know what to think. If we don't see actual video of Assange soon, that alone will speak volumes, why would there be none, even from the court?

Granted, the Gettysburg Address "Mandela" fakery compliments of the tech left is not helping things either. It has nothing to do with Wikileaks directly, but does clearly show that extremely convincing and downright audacious fakery can and will be done.

Perhaps the real issue with my doubting all of this originates from a proven scamming press that can't be trusted to tell the truth with anything at all, and instead repeatedly produces fake after fake after fake. Given the background of what went on with Assange, a fair degree of skepticism is certainly in order. I am going to have to sit this one out and watch for screw ups.

Trump doubled down on sending illegal immigrants exclusively to sanctuary cities

This is a great idea, and he's repeating that it will be done. SEE THIS.

To be clear, (because I noticed people are not understanding this in forums and blogs -

Wikileaks did not expose that the Gettysburg address was changed. The point I am making is that the deep fakes are so real, the tech left changed the Gettysburg Address and it was done in a very convincing way. If they can be that convincing with a historic document, where even old photos have had the text changed, there's no question they can totally fake Assange now, especially if they are audacious enough to mess with such a well known historic document.

They were not complete in their purge of the Gettysburg Address, Johnny Cash preserved the original and you can damn well bet he did not get it wrong.

UPDATE TO BELOW:

I discussed the topic of the Gettysburg address being changed with Claudia and how the revisionists were first noticed when they claimed Nelson Mandela was still alive (after everyone knew he died in prison) and as it turns out, Mexicans all know he died in prison long long ago and this hoax "Mandela effect" never happened in Mexico. It appears that it is all a stunt the tech left is pulling to re-write the history of Western civilization, even despite it all remaining intact in countries like Mexico. Claudia said they would never get away with it in Mexico because the old books are kept by everyone and not thrown away. I am not so sure this will work for them long term, but for now, the "Mandela effect" is not happening in Mexico, at least not as much.

FOLKS, THE SCAMMING TECH LEFT HAS CHANGED THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS. It is now Four score and seven years ago our fathers! The tech left has replaced "forefathers" with "fathers" and have obviously employed supercomputers to comb every record everyone has and change it to fathers, including photos people have, even private personal photos. There is now NO QUESTION AT ALL that's what operating system updates are really doing, they are going into everyone's photos and documents and changing what is there to match the new narrative, whatever it happens to be. If this is hard for you to believe, go check the Gettysburg Address on all sites that claim to be for "history", even the photos, and see for yourself.

There's no other way this historic document could have been purged so well, and so completely, and the quality of the hoaxing of photos is so high there's now reason to believe Julian Assange is in fact dead and they are hoaxing even him.

It might be hard to believe you did not remember the Gettysburg Address wrong after bathing in 500 photos "proving" you remembered it wrong but I found proof you did not remember it wrong. As it turns out, Johnny Cash put it to music. Since the revisionist AI was not set to hunt out music and destroy even that, it stayed preserved via Johnny Cash.

Their revisionist AI made a fatal screw up and I found it there. It can be assumed that the AI will change that Johnny Cash tune as soon as the tech left figures out it was preserved there, but I checked again this morning and it was still legit and also saved it. It is evident now that saving it on a computer will not be good enough however, the AI will find it's way in and wipe it out. This is obviously what all those huge supercomputers are at least in part, really for.

If you still have those old encyclopedias, or there is a set you can go get, DO IT, AND GUARD IT WITH YOUR LIFE. Believe nothing, the tech left is clearly hell bent on destroying true history.

 

End of Wikileaks timeline

October 23 2016 - Wikileaks director Gavey Macfadyen dead.
April 16, 2016 - Wikileaks lawyer John Jones dead ("jumped in front of train") (suicide)
May 11 2016 - Wikileaks Chief Counsel Michael Ratner dead.
October 16 2016 - Pamela brings Assange "lunch", claims he was not feeling well after eating it, and on October 17 Assange had his "internet cut".

At an unknown date, suddenly the Gettysburg Address was re-written to "four score and seven years ago, our FATHERS set forth . . . . instead of forefathers, including perfectly re-written photos confirming that's what the text always was. Yes folks, the deep fake is for real.

And then Assange makes his mystery miracle appearance, after being totally unseen since Pamela brought him lunch. YEAH RIGHT.

I was going along with the Assange story until I found out what happened with the Gettysburg Address, and how convincing it is. Fortunately I was able to bust it, scroll down to that report. It proves they really could totally fake Assange, and I am more skeptical than ever now.

Israeli moon probe update:

The photo from the Israeli spacecraft I posted yesterday was posted by Fox News Approximately a day later. As it turns out, it was taken by the craft before it crashed despite it looking like it was taken from the ground. I am still skeptical and don't fully believe it crashed or that the photo really was taken from miles above the moon as claimed, it does not look right for that (too much ground detail).

I am now convinced Assange is not in court, and the embassy did not kick him out this week (he has not been there for years)

Here is why. I can prove they probably faked the Assange photos with a simple image search of the Gettysburg Address. GET A LOAD OF THIS: They back wiped all the digital copies of photos, probably even via windows updates for those who had them, and the Gettysburg Address now, even in the photos, says FATHERS, not forefathers. Yet the AI missed references to the Gettysburg address in Johnny Cash tunes, computer programming forums, and English structure web sites. It purged only the places that claimed to record history and forgot music, other forms of education, and off topic blogs that happened to reference it. The AI actually over wrote ALL PHOTO REFERENCES and re-arranged the text in all photos perfectly. If this happened, software can do anything now, and can do it in bulk, automatically. See this. No matter how the photo appears or what font it is in, it has been perfectly corrected to replace "forefathers" with "fathers". Yet this Johnny Cash tune still has forefathers, and you can "take it to the bank" that Johnny Cash did not screw this up. The proper reference he provided was overlooked because music was not in the genre the AI was set to hunt out.

It has become obvious that what is happening now is that revisionists, who want to destroy history, have started using massively powerful artificial intelligence to back write everything digital, including even photos and locations of historic reference, provided they are in digital form. There is probably no "Mandela effect" per se, instead there likely are revisionists using advanced AI to back write everything and erase reality from the internet. This time they screwed up and only re-wrote direct historic reference that claimed to be historic reference and missed music. I'll believe Johnny Cash long before I'll trust a Google linked history site (or any site or photo any search engine pulls up nowadays.) We are obviously in the middle of a war, and the tech left is doing all it can to erase who we are in this war.

Due to the fact that the fakes of all the documents and photos of the Gettysburg address are totally convincing, no matter what font, paper, material, camera angle - you name it - I am going to call it like I suspected all along. Assange is yet another one of these fakes, if the AI could fake all those photos so well, in addition to finding them, hacking the computer they were on and replacing them with something that looks perfect, there's no reason at all to believe we got the truth with Assange over the past couple days. Pamela is faking a love affair after bringing him "lunch" in 2016, the base reality of it all is now written in the Gettysburg Address, PERIOD.

Trump: Put illegals in sanctuary cities. Pelosi: Trump's Sanctuary City Proposal Is 'Unworthy of the Presidency of the United States'

Oh really Nancy? Where else are they going to go if you keep using the 9th circuit to stifle Trump's every move? WHERE THE HELL ELSE IS A BETTER PLACE NANCY??!!??

When I said "they highlighted and deleted" the latest Assange report, I mean, to be clear, right in front of me on the screen it highlighted and deleted by itself and I had to re-write it.

Therefore it is probably BANG ON.

GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW "MANDELA EFFECT" REWRITE!

I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS. Other people were not able to bust it and are lamenting how "history changed all the way back to the beginning of time". History did not change, this is just revisionists messing with us and I found proof.

It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase "Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." is now being changed to "Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Ok, so search this on Google. Just type "four score and seven years ago". Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.

I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.

THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED IT

This is the first time this ever happened in "combat mode"

I will try to re-type this as well as possible.

They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.

The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.

According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here's why:

1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.

Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we'd have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.

There's lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally "officially" removed is what you'd expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won't ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated - PRESIDENT TRUMP.

They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.

They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because "Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK." Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can't possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.

Assange went from "cool" to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?

That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

Israeli moon probe update:

The photo from the Israeli spacecraft I posted yesterday was posted by Fox News Approximately a day later. As it turns out, it was taken by the craft before it crashed despite it looking like it was taken from the ground. I am still skeptical and don't fully believe it crashed or that the photo really was taken from miles above the moon as claimed, it does not look right for that (too much ground detail).

I am now convinced Assange is not in court, and the embassy did not kick him out this week (he has not been there for years)

Here is why. I can prove they probably faked the Assange photos with a simple image search of the Gettysburg Address. GET A LOAD OF THIS: They back wiped all the digital copies of photos, probably even via windows updates for those who had them, and the Gettysburg Address now, even in the photos, says FATHERS, not forefathers. Yet the AI missed references to the Gettysburg address in Johnny Cash tunes, computer programming forums, and English structure web sites. It purged only the places that claimed to record history and forgot music, other forms of education, and off topic blogs that happened to reference it. The AI actually over wrote ALL PHOTO REFERENCES and re-arranged the text in all photos perfectly. If this happened, software can do anything now, and can do it in bulk, automatically. See this. No matter how the photo appears or what font it is in, it has been perfectly corrected to replace "forefathers" with "fathers". Yet this Johnny Cash tune still has forefathers, and you can "take it to the bank" that Johnny Cash did not screw this up. The proper reference he provided was overlooked because music was not in the genre the AI was set to hunt out.

It has become obvious that what is happening now is that revisionists, who want to destroy history, have started using massively powerful artificial intelligence to back write everything digital, including even photos and locations of historic reference, provided they are in digital form. There is probably no "Mandela effect" per se, instead there likely are revisionists using advanced AI to back write everything and erase reality from the internet. This time they screwed up and only re-wrote direct historic reference that claimed to be historic reference and missed music. I'll believe Johnny Cash long before I'll trust a Google linked history site (or any site or photo any search engine pulls up nowadays.) We are obviously in the middle of a war, and the tech left is doing all it can to erase who we are in this war.

Due to the fact that the fakes of all the documents and photos of the Gettysburg address are totally convincing, no matter what font, paper, material, camera angle - you name it - I am going to call it like I suspected all along. Assange is yet another one of these fakes, if the AI could fake all those photos so well, in addition to finding them, hacking the computer they were on and replacing them with something that looks perfect, there's no reason at all to believe we got the truth with Assange over the past couple days. Pamela is faking a love affair after bringing him "lunch" in 2016, the base reality of it all is now written in the Gettysburg Address, PERIOD.

Trump: Put illegals in sanctuary cities. Pelosi: Trump's Sanctuary City Proposal Is 'Unworthy of the Presidency of the United States'

Oh really Nancy? Where else are they going to go if you keep using the 9th circuit to stifle Trump's every move? WHERE THE HELL ELSE IS A BETTER PLACE NANCY??!!??

When I said "they highlighted and deleted" the latest Assange report, I mean, to be clear, right in front of me on the screen it highlighted and deleted by itself and I had to re-write it.

Therefore it is probably BANG ON.

GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW "MANDELA EFFECT" REWRITE!

I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS. Other people were not able to bust it and are lamenting how "history changed all the way back to the beginning of time". History did not change, this is just revisionists messing with us and I found proof.

It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase "Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." is now being changed to "Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Ok, so search this on Google. Just type "four score and seven years ago". Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.

I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.

THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED IT

This is the first time this ever happened in "combat mode"

I will try to re-type this as well as possible.

They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.

The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.

According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here's why:

1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.

Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we'd have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.

There's lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally "officially" removed is what you'd expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won't ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated - PRESIDENT TRUMP.

They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.

They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because "Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK." Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can't possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.

Assange went from "cool" to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?

That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday's stuff.

 

I am getting messed with badly today. I did not make the following error, which headlined the entire report above. I will have to log in to fix this.

GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW "MANDELA EFFECT" REWRITE!

HA HA, I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS.

It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase "Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." is now being changed to "Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Ok, so search this on Google. Just type "four score and seven years ago". Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.

I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.

THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED IT

This is the first time this ever happened in "combat mode"

I will try to re-type this as well as possible.

They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.

The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.

According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here's why:

1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.

Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we'd have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.

There's lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally "officially" removed is what you'd expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won't ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated - PRESIDENT TRUMP.

They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.

They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because "Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK." Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can't possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.

Assange went from "cool" to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?

That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday's stuff.

 

THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED IT

This is the first time this ever happened in "combat mode"

I will try to re-type this as well as possible.

They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.

The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.

According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here's why:

1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.

Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we'd have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.

There's lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally "officially" removed is what you'd expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won't ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated - PRESIDENT TRUMP.

They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.

They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because "Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK." Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can't possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.

Assange went from "cool" to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?

That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday's stuff.

 

THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED IT

This is the first time this ever happened in "combat mode"

I will try to re-type this as well as possible.

They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.

The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.

According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here's why:

1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.

Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we'd have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.

There's lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally "officially" removed is what you'd expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won't ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated - PRESIDENT TRUMP.

They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.

They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because "Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK." Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can't possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.

Assange went from "cool" to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?

That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday's stuff.

I figured out the problem with the Assange story

It all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.

Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. So that alone shows that RT can't possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.

At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why there is only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a "never Trumper" now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen - ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he's all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let's get back to "never Trump -

How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished for almost 3 years and then emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He'll be extradited to the U.S. and then he'll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.

And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she's his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too.I am suspicious of it all to say the least.

This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?

Assange rumors

There are so many rumors about what it means and what will happen that I am not going to entertain any of them. All I can say is that I am very surprised by the latest developments, and have some degree of skepticism. It does indeed look like he is alive and well however.

The SpaceX launch was successful, and all 3 boosters returned successfully.

Probable high profit mission.

This Six minute video of the flooding in America's grain belt is well worth watching.

HERE IS AN INTERESTING ONE: Israel's probe may not have crashed

Rumor has it that they faked the crash because they want to keep whatever their probe finds to themselves. There's a problem with that however, and it is that other probes and radio telescopes would pick up on Israel's signals if they were lying about the crash. However, the following photo surfaced. I do not know if it is legit or not:

Assange smeared poo all over embassy walls??!!??

They have a real smear campaign going against Assange. They are claiming he smeared his poop on the walls. DOUBT IT.

As I said in earlier posts down the page a ways, if all of this is legit and it sure looks legit, he's alive. I never in a million years expected that. But though I am prepared to believe he is alive and it actually is Assange (not totally there yet) I will NEVER EVER in a million years believe he was arrested because he smeared poop on the walls and they let the police in after he did it. That's a load of crap, an obvious smear campaign.

There are lots of rumors, one of which was that he was about to do an intelligence release on Ecuador (I don't believe he'd be that stupid) and another far more believable rumor was that someone at the embassy let the police in, against the will of the government of Ecuador. I'd believe that, but am still only partly convinced he really got out. I will cover this as if he did get out because it does indeed look real but there is an awful lot that needs explaining if all of this is legit.

PRIVATE ISRAELI MOON PROBE ABOUT TO LAND, WATCH LIVE STREAM HERE

I am no fan of Israel, however, this is still going to be worth a watch. If you catch this after 5 PM EST it is most likely over, they are unsure of a precise landing time but it is going on NOW.

CROW EATING TIME: It looks like Assange really is alive. (scroll down to main report)

There are a few fishy things with his arrest, but it does look to me like he really is alive. And . . . . 911/311/411. Coincidence?

The current situation with Trump is too complex and sporadic to really comment on

First of all, it appears he's sucking up to Israel and more as part of a deal to get a chance to hang a few traitors. At least it looks that way but who knows. Now we have Pelosi and others asking for apologies from anyone who mentions treason or spying or anything else and I believe this is a real lesson into how leftists and commies function when cornered. "Oh, you have that info? APOLOGIZE FOR IT, it is not legit." Yet another layer in their mind control, hopefully the last layer - which implies YOU ARE SO WRONG WE WANT AN APOLOGY. When in reality you are dead center of the target.

Obviously Trump is correct when he claims treason and coup and everything else, but we have yet to see any action at all on the topic. DEAR TRUMP: ONCE AGAIN, ACTION - NOT WORDS.

On another noteworthy note that probably won't be sung so my comment will be brief:

And I thought about not commenting at all - Texas is proposing a full on abortion ban, including the death penalty for abortion doctors and women who get abortions. Though 446 spoke in favor of it with 54 against, I doubt it would pass. But if it does pass it would be a stunning paradigm shift in the right direction. I can't imagine this happening. TPTB would make Texas the new Venezuela, failing grid and all. I would be genuinely surprised if Texas actually passed such a ban in full form, as it is currently stated, complete with death penalty.

Spacex delayed it's launch yesterday due to high altitude wind shear.

So they are going to try to go for it today. 6:30 PM EST, Falcon Heavy, Arabsat communications satellite (probably complete with 300 inch downward looking reflector telescope, who needs a Falcon Heavy for a satellite? That's the only advertised item on it, why such a huge rocket? I figure something is a little off with this . . . . Anyway, if you are interested in rocket launches this evening is probably a go.

 

Amazon employees listening to Alexa conversations?

Yep. They evidently have a whole department for that. I almost did not even mention this because if anyone is stupid enough to talk into any box like that, they don't read this site anyway. Now imagine how loyal your "companion robot" is going to be. I can hardly wait.

I guess the upshot of it all is that at least with Alexa, you are knowingly talking to something that can rat you out, rather than having an Android phone sit there like a silent stalker GOOGLING at you all the time.

Very odd, considering she hated him prior to 2016: Pamela calls Trump a coward for Assange arrest!

I'll obviously be eating crow because Assange is obviously alive. Guess what: 9/11, 3/11 and now Assange with 4/11. He's awful cheerful in the pics. Perhaps a deal was made.

Black hole pictured: Non-story

No black hole was pictured. The image going around the web and even made part of the Google doodle was not an optical telescopic photo of a black hole, it was instead the result of a math equation applied to data. This type of stuff has been done for years. Non story as far as I see it. When they actually photograph a black hole for real, I'll take notice.

ASSANGE ARREST NOT AN OUTDATED ALREADY BROADCASTED OLD VIDEO AND PICS DREDGE GINSBURG SHOW

TOO MUCH ORIGINAL CONTENT FOR THE ASSANGE STORY TO BE FAKE

I do not think they are using an actor either, it really does look like Assange across multiple clear photos that are all original, complete with exactly the types of scenes you'd expect to see.

The only way I could have been partially right is if he was removed from the embassy in 2016 and held elsewhere, and then brought forward now. But I doubt it at this point, I'll be eating crow I think. I do not think this is an actor, or that it is computer generated.

It really does look like Assange, in a way no one would have thought of faking.

I am still looking for leads on him being arrested, to see if it is him and if this is just a "fake shooting" media show, but it really does look like him, with original photos, not faked. If so, I am going to be eating LOTS of crow.

People have already started chattering about what they are going to do under the cover of "Assange being arrested".

Once again, this should not have been possible with the embassy doing official statements about how he was not getting evicted. This does not totally make sense.

Supposedly Assange was busted for something they could have busted him for in 2012

This appears to be B.S. - the reason given was "Metropolitan Police said in a statement that they arrested Assange on a warrant issued by the Westminster Magistrates’ Court in June 2012, for failing to surrender to the court."

If they could walk into the embassy and do that, why this huge show for 7 years since? There's something seriously bullshitty about that.

That's all there is to the story right now, plus three rather convincing pictures of him through a police van window. I am skeptical, but it sure looks real.

If it really is Assange and not some kind of act or fabrication, I certainly was not expecting it, I had him pegged as dead long ago.

UPDATE: It appears to be Assange and not an impostor. But anything is possible with tech nowadays. There is a look to the photo I would not expect from software however, no matter how good.

Supposedly Assange has been arrested and there's a photo of him.

It took several tries to get the photo here, it looks real. If it is real, I am going to be eating crow but will still say there's no reason for him to have never stepped onto the balcony for all this time, in conjunction with the top 4 people at Wikileaks being killed off.

At least it is not a photo that is based on another photo I have seen (I will be checking on that) but it does appear to be an original (unlike Ginsburg).

BOOOOOOOOM!!!! "Those who started Russia probe were attempting a 'coup', AG must start investigation - Trump

My comment: ACTION, NOT WORDS BUDDY!!!

Want proof the white race is targeted for death? HERE IT IS:

From Breitbart

Parenting magazine Baby & Family has told readers to beware of families who are "inconspicuous" and "cheerful", as these warning signs indicate they are right wing and thus "dangerous".

Depicted with illustrations featuring solely blonde women and children, the report says ordinary parents must take action against right-wing families and make clear that their ideology has no place in the world.

Asserting that the term "right wing" "stirs up anxiety" and brings to mind "burning refugee homes", skinheads, and the National Socialist Underground (NSU) group who carried out a string of violent attacks on foreign people, Baby & Family notes that people "rarely connect it with women, family and children".

My insert: The types of people who belong to the National Socialist Underground are FLAMING ANTI FAMILY LIBERALS, NOT the types this article is bashing and the homes burned were PAID FOR by RIGHT WING FAMILIES. This piece is absolute GARBAGE.

continuing . . . .

This, the high-circulation German magazine declares, "is precisely the great risk" as such people are just as dangerous if not more so as gangs of Nazi skinheads. The identifying features of right-wing families, it contends, are that they are "inconspicuous, blond, cute and engaged".

My comment: This reads like an april fools joke. But it is not.

continuing . . . .

"First of all, [right-wing families] are nice and dedicated" Michaela Kottig, sociologist and researcher of right-wing extremism at the Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, alleges.

Researcher of right-wing politics, Eva Prausner, says a huge danger of right-wing families is that they seem normal.

Because of this, she says many parents will already have established good relations with them to the point that they "are no longer marginalised and at worst, get support".

While there are different types of right-wing families, Baby & Family asserts that daycare centres should always seek help when dealing with them.

"The right has many forms. The definition of what is extreme and what is not is difficult", it says, but asserts that all manifestations must be dealt with because right wingers could spread their views when meeting with other parents in the playground.

Heike Radvan of the controversial Amadeu Antonio Foundation warns that "children of right-wing parents are not necessarily different from other children", but says they are often "very obedient" and might not talk much.

Despite asserting that such children are not outspoken, the "experts" wheeled out by the magazine warn that a sinister aspect of right-wing parenting is that they instil self-confidence in their progeny.

They do this, Prausner posits, in hope that "their offspring will later confidently carry their ideology into the world".

Kottig explains that right-wing families are not unlike ordinary families in that they teach their own values. The important difference with extreme right-wing groups, however, is that these values are "strongly geared at Germanic customs and traditions".

My comment: English is a Germanic language, and America has similar customs and traditions. Though this was a German publication, it is clear who the target is. And we all know who is shooting. This was not an April fools joke, this happened a while ago.

BLOCKBUSTER DISCOVERY: "Scientists" have concluded that women with bigger butts have smarter children

The report is SPOT ON. I have proof.

Nut Yahoo allegedly "won" the Israeli election

"Allegedly," because their elections are as rigged as ours!

SpaceX is doing their most daring launch ever today

It is scheduled for 6:30 EST and will lift a communications satellite for the Arab world. This time, three different boosters will attempt to return home, with the largest one doing a hot and nasty re-entry. This one ought to be interesting.

Like I said yesterday, something changed with Venezuela's grid.

Last night it dropped to 20 percent again indicating Guri was taken out, but the restoration process happened without delay and faster than it ever has. Wait and see what happens next I guess.

I am sick and tired of American war hawks messing with other people's countries. America used to have a great image before they pulled all the war crap.

Update to below: A four lane divided interstate highway costs about 4 million dollars per mile to build, on average, overpasses and all, in the state of Missouri. The new wall going in is going to cost $20 million per mile. RIPOFF, interstate is MUCH MORE DIFFICULT AND EXPENSIVE THAN WALL. So they will build the wall, provided it is on the $700 toilet seat model. In reality, a billion dollars should pay for at least 500 miles of wall, if not a thousand. Current prices put the cost of the wall at $3, 390.00 PER LINEAR FOOT. F****ING RIIIIIIPOFF!!!

 

The Pentagon has now awarded $1 billion in contracts to build the border wall

50 feet of wall will be built, one $700 toilet seat at a time.

 

The power probably will not go totally out in Venezuela again

I have been watching what they are doing with the power there, and it appears to be this: Bring a generator at Guri online, shut another one down, replace controls on the one that was shut down to a virus proof setup, bring it online, shut another generator down, repeat repeat repeat, with the average power levels climbing higher and higher slowly, now up to about 91 percent. That will make at least Guri virus proof, but it won't stop bombs, missiles and .50 cal. But with Guaido going right down the ol'shitteree with the last protests, having popularity only in the mind of the American MSM, it is becoming pretty obvious the power ruse did not work and the only way to take down Maduro will be America's special forces. Maybe they can consult Iran's special forces for this, since Iran's are all now "terrorists".

 

FACE IT ISRAEL: YOUR ELECTIONS ARE AS RIGGED AS AMERICA'S

Nothing follows.

 

Missing Japanese F-35 update

Enough time has passed now for it to be presumed lost. And I'll say "presumed", because there is a chance the pilot made a special delivery. In that case "lost" would only be the perception of the Japanese.

MANDATORY VACCINES: NEW YORK MAYOR DE BLASIO DECLARES EMERGENCY

After a judge struck down a ban on unvaccinated people in public Deblasio followed up with an order for mandatory vaccination to "combat a measels outbreak". Problem: Measels is NOTHING. It is not a killer disease. So there is an ulterior motive to DeBlasio declaring an emergency and mandating the MMR shot - (you know, the one FAMOUS for causing autism like symptoms) and public safety is DEFINITELY NOT IT.

Why this huge push to get everyone "vaccinated"? I have an answer: Because Italy tested this shot and found out it is not a vaccine at all, it has none of the antigens needed to treat what it claims to treat and NONE of the listed ingredients either. It is a phony eugenics shot, and DeBlasio is gonna ram it, come hell or high water.

If we did not have a scamming MSM that was our outright enemy, having a first world nation test a shot parents know wrecked their kids, and having that shot be a 100 percent fraud across the board confirmed by a first world nation ought to be front line never let it die on the air 24/7 for a month news, with follow up lawsuits and people going to jail. But we won't have that because of who owns the media, and what their unified objectives are.

Go Go DeBlasio, you might as well because if control is lost and justice is served, you'll be hung.

China is doing a full on Christian and Muslim purge

It always happens with the commies, as soon as people will put up with it

This is a near totally censored topic, obviously because the goals are the same elsewhere, including the U.S. and those fronting this effort in America and Europe don't want people to be aware of how it is progressing elsewhere. At any rate, this is no big secret with China, except for what has started happening recently. I will state this clearly according to what I have found over the past few months (and years) -

It all started with Falun Gong. They were fringe enough for people to ignore. It then happened to the Muslims, because they had been back stabbed enough in the global media to get away with causing major problems for. Then they came for the Christians. It started modestly, with government approved churches a couple years ago, and the bulldozing of very prominent and large Christian churches started a few months ago.

Now after many churches got bulldozed, Christians have started gathering in homes, and the government is offering two months average Chinese pay to anyone who rats out the homes they are gathering in.

Folks, communism is about to go fully naked tyranny in China, yes, they were commie for a while but they never took it to this extreme - For a while, China looked like a communist success story. They still had their religions, they still had their free enterprise and the nation was flourishing. Now we have proof that communists NEVER STOP until the entire system, with all it's ugly fruits, are in place. If they are paying people to rat out people who gather as Christians in their homes it is GAME OVER, China has officially gone off the rails and has once again proven that communism never stops until the last, final nail of ugliness has been driven. This last, final, ugly episode is nowhere to be found in the MSM.

I gotta say, China was looking good for a while

The firing of secret service director happened because of the incident at Mar-A-Lago

From the Daily Mail

Secret Service agents say 'good riddance' to director Alles, who proposed saving money by withdrawing protection of Trump's family and was more interested in getting chummy with agents rather than fixing serious problems Trump ordered acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to fire Director of Secret Service Randolph 'Tex' Alles today His departure was not unexpected and was welcome by most members of the law enforcement agency. The change comes on the heels of an episode at Mar-a-Lago involving a Chinese national on a club guest list who was arrested with devices bearing computer malware

My comment: I still doubt the "devices containing malware" were anything out of the ordinary, it would be a lot more convincing to have caught her plugging in one of the flash drives to a device that was not hers. That did not happen. Whether or not Alles being gone is good or not remains to be seen, after all, Trump IS ALIVE.

Japan just had an F-35 disappear

only a fool would buy one unless that "fool" is Israel. Then a lot more of the plane will probably work.

MOST LIKELY DONATIONS ARE YET AGAIN GETTING MESSED WITH, DO NOT DONATE NOW, THANKS!

If Candida Auris is not a hoax, chances are it is GMO and from the "vaccine" industry

First of all, anything related to "candida" is a yeast infection. They should be straight up in making this clear. Second of all, all reports say that it is only happening among those with compromised immune systems. I have SERIOUS problem with this entire story then, because yeast is a continuous problem for those who are immune compromised and an enormous problem for the AIDS community, where it kills lots of people. Why make a fuss over 600 aids related deaths from a specific form of yeast?

In 2017, aids related complications killed 914, 000 people. Aids is the main cause of fatally compromised immune systems. Yet Candida Auris was singled out from among those causes, where 914, 000 people died, a majority from yeast, and it killed fewer than 600? What's the big deal then, with this type of yeast? Let me guess:

According to all news reports, it showed up everywhere on earth at the same time. That means something in the global distribution system carried it everywhere. What would that carrier be? There are two possibilities: 1. A defective batch of bread yeast that had global distribution via the company that carried it or - 2. "vaccines".

So let's apply a little "Conspiracy logic" here, the type of logic where you actually think about causes and media results.

Does a company that makes yeast have enough political clout to cover up the fact that they shipped out a batch that started infecting people everywhere? Obvious answer: NO. Is there any other product which uses yeast and gets shipped globally? YES. That product is "vaccines". Do "vaccines" have enough media complicity to cover up deaths and outright murder? YES. Obviously. Therefore, this new strain of "candida" is probably "vaccine" related.

There are not enough associated deaths of immune compromised people to make global news unless someone wants to cover their butts with a controlled media diatribe, to make sure people never look at what the two obvious causes would be.

They have been dabbling in GMO yeast vaccines since 1986 and now, yeast is a very popular go-to choice for a base in vaccine manufacture. Here is a hepatitis vaccine made from it, and also the HPV shot is made from it, along with other vaccines.

I seriously doubt "candida auris" suddenly went global ALL ON ITS OWN. SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT. There was a unified global carrier of this, and my guess at a most probable culprit was a vaccine where a batch got out that did not have the yeast killed off enough and it was a GMO strain of yeast that is now in the environment, killing people who have AIDS. So far it is only hitting immune-compromised people. The numbers are way too small for this to get attention unless someone powerful gave it attention, to get control of the dialogue and make sure no one points the finger at them. If you want to derail an investigation, be a part of it!

Very odd headline: America labels Iran's military a "terrorist" organization, and Iran threatened retaliation

Question: How is Iran going to retaliate against that? That's a weird headline if I ever saw one. First of all, you can't just label a foreign nation's equivalent of America's special forces a "terror group" so I doubt the world will go along with it outside the USRAEL and second of all, after being labeled that, what is Iran going to do? NOTHING. There won't be any retaliation that goes beyond yelling at a screen and printing B.S. so why bother mentioning "retaliation" at all? Real retaliation from Iran would only result in getting Iran's main nuclear reactor wiped out. Only words changed and name calling happened, but I am sure Nut Yahoo is pleased.

April donations needed

You can help support this web site via Paypal and

claudiaprimerc@gmail.com

Thanks!

It may be possible to get by this month with $550 (this includes donations that came in recently, the total needed is now $416) thanks!

??!!?? Trump fires secret service director???

That's something I did not expect, after all, Trump is not dead yet. However, it was rumored that Trump did not trust the secret service and employed other forces, including ones he paid for himself. That rumor may actually be true. Things are looking hopeful, if all this is happening because Mueller failed, and Trump is not afraid to take action anymore.

HEADS UP: PARADIGM SHIFT

Yesterday I posted about Kirstjen Nielsen leaving the DHS. There were conflicting reports about her being forced out and leaving because she wanted to. Trump's tweet was very polite. But here's the answer: She was forced out in the worst way possible BY TRUMP, he kicked her @ss out in an unprecedented way and I really don't know how. The media saying she quit because she did not like being yelled at by Trump is BUNK, she fought it tooth and nail and held on until that one last detail I know nothing about happened, and was then gone. Trump immediately replaced her with Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan.

Nielsen was a scam agent at the DHS. She did everything she could to keep the borders open. She was a top down 100 percent open borders hate white America New World Order troll. The paradigm shift has happened. Someone who actually wants border security now heads the DHS. This is gonna be something to watch., /p>

Venezuela is going to make it

I repeat again that I am not a fan of socialism. However, the key thing with any system is whether or not the people at the top are evil. In the case of Venezuela, they were not evil. Venezuelans enjoyed amazing freedom that Americans lost 50 years ago. Here is what freedom is:

Freedom is the ability to open a store or restaurant in your own home, or sell hamburgers off your grill in front of your house and never having to ask anyone to do it, you just do it. Freedom is: There is a traffic jam, but in the part of the road the traffic jam is blocking the shoulder is four lanes wide of perfectly smooth grass. You drive on that to get around the traffic jam and no one worries about a ticket. Seriously. Question: Why is it that in America when a truck flips over blocking all lanes does everyone just sit there when there is a perfectly driveable shoulder they could use to get around it? ANSWER: Americans are so controlled they can't see an obvious solution to the problem and then use it, and if they did use it they'd get busted and possibly even jailed.

In a free country, when you lose your job, (if you don't want to lose everything else) you think of anything you can do to make money. Sell candy bars or toys in the street. Start cooking on the corner selling BLT's. Go into parking lots offering to wash cars from a five gallon pail. ANYTHING. And if you did ANY of that crap in the U.S. you'd be busted so fast you would not see your first sale, because AMERICANS LOST IT ALL while the scamming MSM waved a flag, sang a song about freedom and told Americans how much better they have it than anyone else. That kind of income cannot be taxed, and DAMMIT, YOU WILL BE TAXED, PERIOD. Go to hell and die before you get away from a tax!

Immigrants have a distorted view of America

FACT: People do not want to come to America to compete with Americans. They want to come to America to TAKE from Americans via welfare while working for a corporation for 10 percent less than an American would ask, and on top of it get their free hand out at the expense of the American, who's job they took. And the police in ALL ZONES now have been instructed to not enforce laws with immigrants, but to enforce all of them with psychopathic vigor against white America. So the immigrants come and see this "great free country" when in fact, for the main street American, freedom is only a play word. If the immigrants had to deal with the police and state agencies the way Americans do, they would GTFO post haste, their countries are a lot better in that regard, Americans put up with crap no one from elsewhere would ever dream of putting up with. You mean I can't sell food from my kitchen, or potato chips on the corner, or trim trees or anything else without a permit? HA HA HA you're an idiot, America is a free country, and I can do that without a permit in my country, which is not free! YOU ARE LYING TO ME. YOU are sleeping in a ditch because you don't want to get yourself out of it, TRIM TREES FOR GOD'S SAKE, There's NO WAY you are not allowed to do that without a permit or license in America if I could do it without permission where I came from!

It is all a game of illusion, where Americans spew about freedom and then get behind the latest tyrant who wants to blow up a place that actually is free, all the while the Americans honestly believe they are doing good. America is so far away from true freedom now that even if the people do manage to shake off tyranny, they won't know how to find their way back to where they once were.

If Americans ever do shake off the tyranny that has now afflicted America at all levels, they will be able to:

Buy a lot for a reasonable price somewhere and PAY CASH. Then, on the first day, put up a tent and live in that, while they build a shack. Then they can move into the shack, and live in that while they buy materials and build a house to live in. BAM, 5 years later the house is all paid for with no debt and they have their house. The state never showed up and harassed them about their kids, the state never showed up and harassed them about their stove or anything else during the entire time, they just lived their lives HURTING NO ONE and GOT IT DONE.

That's the way it was in America in the good old days. No one had to stress out about anything financial, because the state left people the hell alone. All this stress people are under is directly caused by controls the state put in place which prevent people from living a free life. Freedom is not being able to go to Wal Mart when you want, freedom is being able to sell when needed, live as needed, and not have the state give you trouble. I can't go over all aspects of true freedom but can state that Americans have practically none. When Americans were free, they could build their GD houses out of dirt!!! Look up a sod house. You could have your house for FREE when there was freedom, with only the sweat of your brow, and no one would say anything. We are so far away from that kind of freedom now that it might as well be a different universe.

International marathon held in North Korea

Yep, it happened and even included Olympic gold medalists. This is well worth a look

DRUM ROLL: 8 Criminal referrals to hit DOJ on Monday.

The only thing different about this is that it is Fox and not Q. So let's see how long this drum roll lasts. I have always said it is taking too long and such reports are B.S. but if Fox said it, (drum roll)

Homeland security chief Kirstjen Nielsen is out.

There are claims that it was a firing by Trump but it is unclear, because Trump thanked her on his Twitter. Next up to bat - Turmp tweeted "I am pleased to announce that Kevin McAleenan, the current U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, will become Acting Secretary for @DHSgov. I have confidence that Kevin will do a great job!"

We will see where this goes I guess.

DO NOT DONATE NOW

It has stalled for too long and is probably getting messed with. I will re-set the site and post what came in Sunday on Monday. Many thanks to those who helped!

April donations needed

You can help support this web site via Paypal and

claudiaprimerc@gmail.com

Thanks!

A reminder: Once again, Ecuador has (again) flatly denied claims that Assange was going to be evicted

Same old pony show. He never once stepped out on that balcony since Pamela brought him lunch, citing "security reasons". BULLSHIT. And the day after Pamela brought him lunch, his internet got cut. BULLSHIT. Now they pull him out like a fake osama, to make sure we believe he is there but we never get to see him and it always ends like this. BULLSHIT.

I CALL TRIPLE BULLSHIT, Assange is as gone as Osama, who died from a lack of dialysis and subsequently lived for years until Obama took him out and I called it in 2016. How far ahead is that? It helped to have the big black van pull up the night after Pamela brought him lunch and remove Assange, and have it all live streamed - I fully expected the next day's news be nothing but Assange not at the embassy anymore but NOPE - his internet was cut. That was the line they used.

Do not forget: All 4 of the top people at Wikileaks that were not at the embassy died for various reasons in the two months before Pamela brought him lunch, and when Pamela brought him lunch I am surprised he ate it because it was well known at the time that she openly hated his guts. Now that he is gone, she's his lover. YEP. And Wikileaks lives on as a deep state tool, oozing fakeness like Q, and solid proof: NO ACTION HAS EVER BEEN TAKEN ON RELEASES BY WIKILEAKS, OR Q SPEW, in fact, only the opposite has hit reality. Consider that.

We will continue to hear stories of degrading health, near evictions, internet blackouts for Assange and whatever else, because they have to have something make people think he's actually alive. Killing him was a very unpopular prospect, and the image of Wikileaks is just too good of a tool to throw away. Maybe he'll eventually do a cameo on a deep fake, but as for now, we have seen NOTHING.

Absolutely MASSIVE demonstrations in support of Maduro

But all we see today in America's MSM is close tight shots of "huge crowds" for Guaido. All a lie, as usual.

On that note, Maduro announced a little over a week ago that they were going to make Venezuela's grid immune to virus attacks and do rolling blackouts until it was done. This time the power came back on slowly over the past week and is currently at about 85 percent with no significant drop outs on the path upward. If Venezuela actually manages to block out viruses and bring the grid up that fast on a new system, it proves they not only have decent electrical systems, they have remarkable electrical systems and talent. But what's new around here? I said it all along.

Update to below:

I am not certain who the march was for below, some are saying it was for Guaido, others are saying it was for Maduro, but This one was definitely for Maduro

There were several marches on Saturday.

Massive demonstrations in favor of Maduro today

Venezuelans are calling it a "red tide" and making fun of the U.S. claims that the people want Guaido, who never drew even a fraction of such crowds (the difference is about as big as Trump and Hillary) See this.

RUMOR: The following script destroyed confidence in the United States by foreign powers, mainly Russia and China

The rumor is that when they saw this getting passed around between Democrat senators, other democrats and leftists and at a huge rally, they considered the United States to be an unstable country. Trump was fully cleared, and then this. it is NOT GOOD. If you think the Russia collusion game is over, just read this chant they were singing. Foreign powers actually noticed this, and it IS a BIG DEAL.

What the hell did Putin think when he saw this? It is confirmed that both he and Xi Jinping saw this and basically flipped out. That's BAD NEWS folks, this is the kind of crap you see in totally de-stabilized nations.

This was uncovered by Sorcha, but in this case, it is not dubious or any kind of ruse, this really was "circulating the Kremlin". I strongly suggest you take a look at this Sorcha report, Sorcha is sometimes sketchy but this time it is BANG ON. Both the image below and Sorcha's take on it are actually legit and downright dreadful.

Closing comment: UH OH.

 

We now have proof that not all lives matter

Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg: I will no longer say 'all lives matter'

Democrat presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg has been forced to rescind his signature statement "All lives matter". Because some lives DO NOT MATTER, especially if you are young, white, and male. Then you don't matter, you are slated for destruction. If this was not true, Pete would have had no problems saying "all lives matter". Obviously some do not, SO TAKE YOUR DAMN VACCINE TAILORED TO DESTROY YOU WORSE THAN ANYONE IF YOU ARE WHITE, PLUS YOUR EXISTENCE STRAIGHT TO HELL. There's absolutely no question that's what the so-called elite yearn for and are making a reality.

You can't make this stuff up, a "select few" have to show their true colors and then WOOP there it is. See this

HA HA, I CALLED IT AND I AM NOT A PROPHET

ECUADOR: What are you talking about? Assange is NOT getting evicted.

Yes, the same old dog and pony show, just like I said. Ecuador's ambassador just said they never had any intentions of evicting Assange, but the UK police showed up and surrounded the place for a show, to convince the world he's really there.

SEE THIS.

And now, what I said yesterday:

You will not see one photo or piece of video of Julian assange

So he's about to be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy eh? After not doing as much as a cameo on the balcony since before Trump was elected. YEP.

The MSM can bluff all it wants. PICTURES AND VIDEO AND I MEAN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN. Then again, from this point on there will always be penguins. I doubt they will accomplish it with Assange though. They are lazy. Assange might not get the flying penguin treatment, they will just opt to not show anything at all, and cite some B.S. like "privacy" or "legal issues". Or maybe they will let the whole topic die and pull him out like a fake Osama when needed.

MY COMMENT:

And that's what I am at least partially around for, - to call out B.S. only to have it proven B.S. later. GOTCHA. I am probably going to be using that "HA HA" picture a lot now.

The following is a double post of the above because I messed up the link.

HA HA, I CALLED IT AND I AM NOT A PROPHET

ECUADOR: What are you talking about? Assange is NOT getting evicted.

Yes, the same old dog and pony show, just like I said. Ecuador's ambassador just said they never had any intentions of evicting Assange, but the UK police showed up and surrounded the place for a show, to convince the world he's really there.

SEE THIS.

And now, what I said yesterday:

You will not see one photo or piece of video of Julian assange

So he's about to be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy eh? After not doing as much as a cameo on the balcony since before Trump was elected. YEP.

The MSM can bluff all it wants. PICTURES AND VIDEO AND I MEAN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN. Then again, from this point on there will always be penguins. I doubt they will accomplish it with Assange though. They are lazy. Assange might not get the flying penguin treatment, they will just opt to not show anything at all, and cite some B.S. like "privacy" or "legal issues". Or maybe they will let the whole topic die and pull him out like a fake Osama when needed.

MY COMMENT:

And that's what I am at least partially around for, - to call out B.S. only to have it proven B.S. later. GOTCHA. I am probably going to be using that "HA HA" picture a lot now.

LBGT history to be taught to five year olds?

I did not even know they had a history. But a lib with a commie streak can invent anything.

And I'm a "conspiracy theorist." Right. For saying this is where we were headed all along. YEP. If 10 years ago anyone said this would be done in America's schools, you'd have been given the tinfoil hat award and it would have been anchored to your head permanently with steel pegs. And here we are.

Here is where we will be: If parents don't rebel against this, future sex education will feature actually anally screwing other students, as well as actually carrying out normal sex, for credit, in class. If you don't do it, you fail. This will definitely happen, there is no question at this point that they fully intend to take it all the way. I'm nuts for saying that, so grab the tinfoil and steel pegs. And then wait for your turn to wear a dunce cap for calling bullshit, probably 15 years from now if this "progress" is not stopped. Indeed, change is not always "good".

UPDATE TO BELOW:

I abandoned Google some time ago. Not only do I not use Google, I don't often use search engines that depend on Google. Duck Duck Go depends on Google, so it takes a serious back burner to Yippy, which is actually an independent search engine. Also independent Bing can be assumed evil but Google definitely takes the cake and should be everyone's DEAD LAST CONSIDERATION.

 

GOOGLE FIRES AI ETHICS COUNCIL BECAUSE GOOGLE CAN'T BE TROUBLED BY ETHICS

Only a week ago, Google set up an AI ethics council, and only a week later it is gone. Why would that happen? Obviously because Google and ethics don't mix. The council must have been legit and the greater Google did not like the conclusions.

From Reuters: "Alphabet Inc's Google said on Thursday it was dissolving a council it had formed a week earlier to consider ethical issues around artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies.

The council had run into controversy over two of its members, according to online news portal Vox, which first reported the dissolution of the council.

The council, launched on March 26, was meant to provide recommendations for Google and other companies and researchers working in areas such as facial recognition software, a form of automation that has prompted concerns about racial bias and other limitations.

My comment: It was too short lived to be realistic. It produced answers with regard to conservative issues and transsexuals that Google did not like, so they canned it. And that really is all there is to it I was surprised the report did not back off and hide the fact that it really was all there is to it. Google dabbled in ethics, and abandoned the idea in only a week.

About Cohen's "14 million files of significance" on Trump

Let's do a little math here. If Cohen has that many files, and worked nothing but Trump for a 40 hour work week, never taking a vacation or holiday (and Jews take TONS of those, FAR MORE than little ol you and me, ) but let's just say he worked as a wage slave that never got a day off, not even Christmas, never took a sick day, and never arrived late or left early. If that is how he worked, it would require him to generate 1 Trump file EVERY SECOND for 680 work days, or about two years. If he spent even 10 seconds generating each file, he'd have to sit there for 20 years. And that's just one hard drive.

I'd say it would take about 10 minutes, or 600 seconds to generate a file of significance on someone, (on average) if they were files that were not demanding of time. Even by that measure (which is still very unrealistically low for an average time length to generate a significant file) Cohen would have to sit a desk for 1, 200 years to do it if all he ever did was work on Trump.

CONCLUSION: It is not possible to generate 14, 000, 000 "files of significance" in one's lifetime, Cohen is babbling like a retard.

There seems to be a serious issue with Trump now

I cannot put my finger on it directly, but with the way he is talking about Venezuela, caving on the border, sucking up to Israel, and not prosecuting ANYONE it appears something is seriously amiss. I am waiting for more things to unfold before stating an opinion on what is going on with him now, but I have definitely noticed something is not quite right. It is going to take more than twitter memes and rants to get anywhere, what's the hold up?

You will not see one photo or piece of video of Julian assange

So he's about to be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy eh? After not doing as much as a cameo on the balcony since before Trump was elected. YEP.

The MSM can bluff all it wants. PICTURES AND VIDEO AND I MEAN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN. Then again, from this point on there will always be penguins. I doubt they will accomplish it with Assange though. They are lazy. Assange might not get the flying penguin treatment, they will just opt to not show anything at all, and cite some B.S. like "privacy" or "legal issues". Or maybe they will let the whole topic die and pull him out like a fake Osama when needed.

HA HA, My recent vaccine post just destroyed a troll

To someone elses comment, Troll posted to a well known forum:

"Yeah, fact-free anti-vax derogatory posts without any substance like yours are a joke.

Tell me how the world is flat..."

I responded with an excerpt from what I posted yesterday:

Ohh, you are F***ED with that "world is flat" line.

They have a vaccine that can reverse the damage. As it turns out, the damage is 100 percent reversible, all you have to do is tell the immune system to stop destroying squalene. And this can be done via a secondary shot that tells the immune system to destroy the antibodies for squalene. Anyone that got such a shot would come out of a fog in about two weeks with proper nutrition. So once the elite can declare total victory, they can fix the right people with a shot and work them as slaves in positions they can't find the talent for among their own ranks. If we don't stop this NOW, and I mean RIGHT NOW, we are in for a hideous future, and your guns are not going to save you. They could not get rid of the second amendment, so they got around it via trusted institutions and destroyed us anyway, with shots we thought were real but were not for their stated purpose. They blamed the parents for all deaths via their "shaken baby syndrome" scam and all brain damage on "bad genes".

They pointed the finger at anyone who figured it out, calling the brightest people who could see it "anti science" and drove it home with "flat earth".

They used embarrassment and degradation to maintain control of those who knew something was amiss, and when that did not work, they resorted to murder. They are the world's most despicable cretins, who stand as proof mankind is not ready to have technology because too much filth still exists that will, as soon as it is able, use that tech to destroy everyone.

YEP. "Flat Earth", I NAILED IT.

____________________________________________

MY GOD. I can't believe Trump tweeted this. Click it - describing it won't cut it.

There have been an extremely large number of fires in Texas

All the fires have been against oil and chemical storage facilities, and many have been MASSIVE.

Such fires only make the news in the U.S. once every couple years. To have more than 8 over the last week is not plausible unless someone is getting even, and that someone is probably Venezuela. They are claiming lightning did the last 3. DOUBT IT.

At present, it appears to me that Venezuela is virus-proofing it's grid. The main problem has been virus attacks, with a secondary major problem being sharpshooters and explosives.

I am not buying the Mar-A-Lago malware crap

That's why I am not covering it much. If China needs a spy, Hillary will get it done. Working through Mar-A-Lago which is not even government with "malware" is too stupid a story to even breathe on. And OH MY GOD, I have in my vicinity a tablet, two cell phones and four laptops, and several flash drives with "malware" of one form or another on them (I assume they are crapped after running this site.) If that's the issue with the Chinese girl, who should not have even been let in to begin with, some reporter needs to GET A LIFE.

Now THIS is RIDICULOUS:

Two men agreed to shoot each other while wearing a bullet proof vest. Neither pressed charges. But the state prosecutor took over, and charged them both with assault.

That's not only ridiculous, it is CRIMINALLY ASSININE. Neither guy was mad at the other (at first) and neither guy wanted anything to happen. They still don't. Yet the state prosecuted them anyway. What gives the state the right to prosecute people who agreed to do something, were not seriously hurt, and held no grudges afterwards? If this flies, the sky is the limit on tyranny. Granted, they were obviously not the brightest but you really should not prosecute stupid.

THE "ELITE" ARE NOW POSTING VACCINE CRAP LIKE THIS:

"Anyone who is not vaccinated is a lethal threat to me and my family. Can I legally shoot any anti-vaxx tard who comes close to me or my kids?

I have already told the school that my kids won't attend the class until each and everyone us vaccinated. I will sue the school and state for every school day they miss.

HERE IS THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE: If you are vaccinated, you cannot be threatened right? Therefore you are a BULLSHITTER trying to get everyone to accept a eugenics shot. YOU ARE A THREAT, and rather than harass a school over YOUR bullshit, if you manage to successfully threaten my kids or me or anyone else I know, you'll be shot instead.

RUMOR: The Texas State Guard has been deployed to the border

If this is true, they will start arriving at 6 PM today. Evidently the governor was tired of the Feds doing nothing, so he activated the main component of the state's own military to secure the border. They are heavily armed with real military gear, not "assault rifles". If this rumor is true, it is THE END of the Rio Grande crossings.

The Texas Guard operates totally independent of Federal approval and can use lethal force, the same way the Army can. We will know about this rumor soon. They ought to be on their way right now.

THEY ARE PISSED ABOUT YESTERDAY'S VACCINE REPORTS (which got re-posted everywhere)

If anything is wrong with the top set of reports below (before all the repeats start) including obvious HTML errors, grammar errors or spelling errors, including missing words it only means they nailed it again, I cannot keep ahead of it, I give up.

MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE TODAY

Everything is getting messed up. Someone is doing it, and they are doing it via a local hack, not a server hack. The page is a TOTAL MESS but at least the top part is readable now. I'll fix this later today but for now, unless something really compelling happens, I am going to let this sit - IT PISSED THEM OFF.

 

The following got hacked to smithereens, LIVE, as it was typed, to make it unreadable and appear to be produced by an illiterate. Hopefully I got all the junk out of it before hitting post.

I will probably re-do yesterday's vaccine reports to make them more cohesive, but this is the gist of it:

What is being peddled as vaccines now are in fact biological weapons, that turn your immune system into a weapon against YOU. The purposes are profit and debilitation of an enemy, and that enemy is YOU. If you are going to destroy western civilization without actually shooting people with bullets, the best method is to take trusted institutions and use them to destroy people. It will take people decades to believe it actually happened and by then it will be too late. They are three decades into this now.

The shots are damaging everyone via various adjuvants that trick the body into attacking itself. The shots are hurting white males more than any other group, because in addition to the adjuvants, all those DNA tests everyone submitted to sites like 23 and me were combed for genetic traits that were specific to the exact groups the elite want destroyed most, and the vaccines have, in addition to the adjuvants, the exact materials needed in the presence of these adjuvants (squalene is becoming a main one now) to kick off the destruction a lot worse in white males. This is why boys are getting autism a lot more frequently than girls, and WHITE boys are getting it far more frequently than other boys. The affliction itself is not autism, it is nerve damage that manifests the traits of autism.

They are not sparing the adults anymore

All the vaccines except for the SINGLE SHOT tetanus are not as advertised, even the three shot tetanus shot is sabotage because tetanus has always been a single shot with no boosters. If you got a preventive tetanus shot with boosters despite not being injured, you did not get a tetanus shot at all and are not protected. The purpose of the tetanus shots with boosters is to prevent pregnancy.

Obviously "THEY" know they are on the verge of total and complete conquest. They have maimed 30 years of children. Not all are totally dysfunctional but NONE that got the shots are going to be what they could have been.

There is an antidote

They have a vaccine that can reverse the damage. As it turns out, the damage is 100 percent reversible, all you have to do is tell the immune system to stop destroying squalene. And this can be done via a secondary shot that tells the immune system to destroy the antibodies for squalene. Anyone that got such a shot would come out of a fog in about two weeks with proper nutrition. So once the elite can declare total victory, they can fix the right people with a shot and work them as slaves in positions they can't find the talent for among their own ranks. If we don't stop this NOW, and I mean RIGHT NOW, we are in for a hideous future, and your guns are not going to save you.

They could not get rid of the second amendment, so they got around it via trusted institutions and destroyed us anyway, with shots we thought were real but were not for their stated purpose. They blamed the parents for all deaths via their "shaken baby syndrome" scam and all brain damage on "bad genes". They claimed the white race was "suddenly getting stupid" but did not tell us they knew why. They pointed the finger at anyone who figured it out, calling the brightest people who could see it "anti science". They used embarrassment and degradation to maintain control of those who knew something was amiss with the shots, and when that did not work, they resorted to murder. They are the world's most despicable cretins, who stand as proof mankind is not ready to have technology because too much filth still exists that will, as soon as it is able, use that tech to destroy everyone.

_________________________________________

Beware of april fools jokes

They are everywhere and many are being pushed as real news. This is one reason why I held off on reporting current events for a while, it is very difficult to sort fact from fiction right now. If you hear any story that is "shocking", it would be best to consider it a joke for now. Here is a prime example that is really worth watching, and shows just how deep a deep fake video can go. It seriously, honestly, swear to God looks like penguins can fly (this may sound stupid because everyone knows they can't, but after you see this hoax produced by the BBC you are going to realize just how real an AI can make something look, it had to have been an AI that did this, it is far better than anything Hollywood ever did.

Deep fake penguin flying video looks so real you cannot believe it is not

This is not your garden variety fake, all the expressions, effort, struggle getting off the ground followed by graceful flight look absolutely real, with no hint of special effects whatsoever. Hollywood has never done anything like this, it is not a "make a cat talk" type of video.

It looks so real I had to double triple quadruple confirm it is not real. And worse? It is not even a new video, deep fakes have obviously been out long enough for any political figure you can imagine to not be real. You really can't accept video as evidence anymore and this is a prime example of why.

To clarify the reports below (and one above now)

Squalene is a natural oil your nervous system depends upon. If it does not have it, your nerve endings break down and you have all kinds of neurological disorders, including brain dysfunction. This oil has been chosen as the go to adjuvant for vaccines, and could have only been chosen as an adjuvant by a willful decision to destroy people.

What is an adjuvant?

An adjuvant is a material put in the presence of an antigen your body is supposed to gain an immunity against, to make the reaction to the antigen stronger. But in the process of making the reaction to the antigen stronger, the immune system also sees the adjuvant as the enemy of the body, and will react against anything similar to that adjuvant that happens to be in the body. Since squalene is precisely what your nervous system uses as the primary oil in nerve endings, which it needs there to prevent the nerve endings from dissolving, having the immune system see it as an enemy and subsequently attack it has devastating consequences and the vaccine manufacturers know it.

It is no secret. It is well known (and has been known for over 100 years) that the presence of ANY oil at all in a vaccine, including even totally non-biological mineral oils, will trick the immune system into attacking ALL oils and even mineral oil based adjuvants were considered too devastating to use even in animal experiments because it caused too much suffering of animals. Now the vaccine pushers are taking this knowledge, and using the worst possible oil that will cause the most possible damage as the adjuvant in vaccines, and they KNOW DAMN WELL what they are doing. It is an act of war pure and simple, they are knowingly maiming society and they KNOW IT.

The following report has an error where I made too much text large and bold, I'll fix that later.

Update to below:

There is proof just in the "disease" name (in the report below) that vaccines are causing it. And the medical system has to know it, because it is too obvious and I found proof in a single search. The so-called illness is called "Acute Flaccid Myelitis". From that name, I knew that a lack of squalene in the child's nerves would cause this, without looking anything up I also knew the adjuvants in vaccines contain squalene, which is needed to build the myelin in the nerves. If the immune system is programmed to attack squalene (as will happen if it is an adjuvant in a vaccine, AND THEY KNOW IT) any kid who gets such a shot will have his immune system attack and remove squalene from his nervous system to whatever extent it can, until the vaccine wears off. The kid will be totally screwed up by this. So I did a search to see if this had been censored. It was not censored yet. Here is a great run-down on this topic:

DON'T WORRY, SQUALENE IS BANNED IN THE U.S., RIGHT? NOPE. SEE THIS

There's your "acute flaccid myelitis, And here is an experiment where they injected it into rats to see what would happen. Here is the key quote from that experiment:

"The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of squalene on the central and peripheral nervous systems in rat at the ultrastructural level. Squalene was administered at a dose of 20 g/kg body weight, once daily for 4 days, and the animals were sacrificed 7 days and 30 days after the initiation of the experiment. After 7 days a mild swelling of mitochondria and dilation of the Golgi complex cisterns in few neurons in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus were observed. The swelling of astrocytes and their processes was also seen. Some myelin sheaths in the cerebral white matter were disintegrated. In the peripheral nervous system (the sciatic nerve), a damage of the Schwann cells, a destruction of the myelin sheaths, and lipid-like deposits between myelin lamellae causing a secondary compression of axons were present.

And this is in the vaccines now and is likely to be what is destroying our kids. A destruction of myelin sheaths is what mercury does, and Squalene will trick the immune system into doing it also. Unlike mercury which will eventually go out of the system, triggering an immune response to destroy myelin will have the effect of eating mercury every day. All get hit, some get totally destroyed. They can't possibly not know what they are doing, this is intentional and they intend to ram it down your throat via mandate. See the report below.

___________________________________________-